@j12t SocialWebFoundation is intrinsically tied to Meta
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
wendinoakland :KINGPENG_PNG: (wendinoakland@beige.party)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 03:43:32 JST wendinoakland :KINGPENG_PNG:
-
Embed this notice
Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 03:43:31 JST Evan Prodromou
@wendinoakland @j12t Yes, Meta is one of our supporters.
-
Embed this notice
Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 03:51:45 JST Evan Prodromou
@wendinoakland @j12t Did you get to read our post about it?
https://socialwebfoundation.org/2025/01/12/content-policy-on-the-social-web/
-
Embed this notice
wendinoakland :KINGPENG_PNG: (wendinoakland@beige.party)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 03:51:46 JST wendinoakland :KINGPENG_PNG:
@evan @j12t Meta has opened the floodgates on potential disinformation about vulnerable populations. It’s important that everyone within the realm of mastodon/fediverse is aware of the changes occurring in the Meta ToS and how they’re incompatible with some basic local fedi precepts
-
Embed this notice
Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 04:59:02 JST Evan Prodromou
@wendinoakland @j12t that's not how open standards work. Anyone can implement ActivityPub and connect to the social web. They don't need the SWF's permission. Whether your server federates or not is up to you and your community! That's what makes the Fediverse great.
-
Embed this notice
wendinoakland :KINGPENG_PNG: (wendinoakland@beige.party)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 04:59:04 JST wendinoakland :KINGPENG_PNG:
@evan @j12t Thx. Until there is an irrefutable about face from Meta retracting their free-for-all on verbal abuse and diminishment of others, I can’t use an affiliate platform without myself supporting their horrific stance. It’s just not ok.
I don’t understand how it’s acceptable for us to now have to battle nazis, because they’re your buds. Understand? Not my problem, not my friends.
-
Embed this notice