Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   mark (atleagle@mastodon.online)'s status on Monday, 13-Jan-2025 00:29:47 JST mark

   in reply to

   • Tomasz Oryński
   • Display Name

   @alper @TOrynski @Brad_Rosenheim the person banging the table about how conversations get derailed is contributing nothing to helping the issue that they say they don't like. It's not an external conversation that is keeping the conversation on types of protests that are ok, it's right here. If someone doesn't want people focused on how protests are done, then they can focus on why the protest exists.

   • Embed this notice
     Display Name (alper@sfba.social)'s status on Monday, 13-Jan-2025 00:29:48 JST Display Name

     • Tomasz Oryński

     @TOrynski @ATLeagle @Brad_Rosenheim people who don't want to change anything sure don't like change discussed so they shift it to talk about something else. And that's normal. You want a protest that will paralyze them so much that they won't fight to derail the conversation. That doesn't exist. Anything that's effective they'll try to frame differently. You do your protest and let other people do theirs. That brings us to what you're doing instead other than criticism of other people's protests which is exactly what fossil fuel lobby wants you to do. Did you damage any private jets yet?