Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 01:13:29 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

   While many (rightfully) celebrate that SNCF might be forced to get rid of gendering when selling tickets, the real message is about how the #GDPR forces you to minimise the data stored to secure a transaction. That’s a deeper and far more important message, IMHO. https://curia.social-network.europa.eu/@Curia/113797739002079373

   • Embed this notice
     pius (pius@freiburg.social)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 01:17:58 JST pius

     in reply to

     @jwildeboer If SNCF would get rid of the forced personalisation even on Paper Tickets, that would be even nicer. Zero need for personal information on them

   • Embed this notice
     Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 01:21:13 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

     in reply to

     This decision could lead to far more consequences about what can be “essential” data in a transaction. (Cookie banners that claim that 100s of “partners” have a “legitimate interest”, for example)

   • Embed this notice
     Chris. R. 🎧🎼☕🍍 (haploc@fedi.cr-net.be)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 01:59:15 JST Chris. R. 🎧🎼☕🍍

     in reply to

     • noyb.eu

     @jwildeboer @noybeu there is no way that that many partners have a legitimate interest. 0 would be closer to the truth.

   • Embed this notice
     pius (pius@freiburg.social)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 06:04:27 JST pius

     @jwildeboer "the real message is about how the #GDPR forces you to minimise the data stored to secure a transaction."

     Well i was referring to this Part of your Post. That's also completely unecessary information on a Paper Ticket