Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 01:13:29 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

   While many (rightfully) celebrate that SNCF might be forced to get rid of gendering when selling tickets, the real message is about how the #GDPR forces you to minimise the data stored to secure a transaction. That’s a deeper and far more important message, IMHO. https://curia.social-network.europa.eu/@Curia/113797739002079373

   • Embed this notice
     Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 01:17:57 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

     in reply to

     • pius

     @pius that’s taking it beyond the decision, which is about the title (Mr, Ms.) and would be a completely separate case and argument.

   • Embed this notice
     pius (pius@freiburg.social)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 01:17:58 JST pius

     in reply to

     @jwildeboer If SNCF would get rid of the forced personalisation even on Paper Tickets, that would be even nicer. Zero need for personal information on them

   • Embed this notice
     Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 01:21:13 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

     in reply to

     This decision could lead to far more consequences about what can be “essential” data in a transaction. (Cookie banners that claim that 100s of “partners” have a “legitimate interest”, for example)

   • Embed this notice
     Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 01:59:14 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

     in reply to

     • noyb.eu
     • Chris. R. 🎧🎼☕🍍

     @haploc @noybeu exactly. Let’s hope someone takes it to the court. This decision might prove helpful.

   • Embed this notice
     Chris. R. 🎧🎼☕🍍 (haploc@fedi.cr-net.be)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 01:59:15 JST Chris. R. 🎧🎼☕🍍

     in reply to

     • noyb.eu

     @jwildeboer @noybeu there is no way that that many partners have a legitimate interest. 0 would be closer to the truth.

   • Embed this notice
     Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 06:04:25 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

     in reply to

     • pius

     @pius You talk about personalisation of a ticket, that means, as far as I understand it, to have the name of the buyer on the ticket, which is thus personalised. If you want to "get rid" of that you talk about anonymous, depersonalised tickets that can be used by anyone, which is a whole different thing, AFAICS.

   • Embed this notice
     pius (pius@freiburg.social)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 06:04:27 JST pius

     in reply to

     @jwildeboer "the real message is about how the #GDPR forces you to minimise the data stored to secure a transaction."

     Well i was referring to this Part of your Post. That's also completely unecessary information on a Paper Ticket