Conversation

With respect to "no demonstrated or theoretical," I want to acknowledge the existence of positive anecdotes about AI. I hate the cliche that "anecdotes are not data," as I find it to be thought-terminating and unnecessarily fatalistic about evidentiary standards. That said, I argue that those few scattered positive anecdotes don't rise to the level of "demonstrated applications," if only because the stochastic plagiarism nature of LLMs predicts that you'll occasionally lucky.