git pack files.
Dear Lazyweb,
Is there any benefit or drawback -- disk space, performance or otherwise -- to having a single 200 GB .pack file (with a .keep file) versus having 200 1GB files?
https://jwz.org/b/ykfc
git pack files.
Dear Lazyweb,
Is there any benefit or drawback -- disk space, performance or otherwise -- to having a single 200 GB .pack file (with a .keep file) versus having 200 1GB files?
https://jwz.org/b/ykfc
@jwz A (potential) benefit would be a better compression ratio (for a single pack file) but the drawback would be the time it takes to repack.
@klausfiend That sounds like a load-bearing "if".
@jwz there's the usual risk of on-disk corruption; more files offer the possibility of recoverability if the packing algorithm supports it.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.