Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   ☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭ (radical_egocom@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 02-Jan-2025 08:52:38 JST ☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭

   in reply to

   • argv minus one

   @argv_minus_one

   The burden of proof is on the one claiming that it's a god. They can keep believing it's a god if they want, but it's in no way up to anyone to prove that they didn't see god. That's not how the burden of proof works. The most that anyone could do is try to explain to them why believing it was god with absolutely no evidence is not a good thing and why they should care if the things they believe are true and not just if they make them feel good.

   • Embed this notice
     argv minus one (argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org)'s status on Thursday, 02-Jan-2025 08:52:39 JST argv minus one

     • Tom Capuder

     @tomcapuder

     As far as the person who had the NDE is concerned, the existence of their god is already affirmatively proven.

     You want such people to believe that what they saw was something other than their god, yes? How would you prove that to them?

     ☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭ repeated this.