Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   のえる (noellabo@fedibird.com)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Aug-2022 03:13:28 JST のえる

   • Hélène
   • infinite love ⴳ
   • Clairement crevée

   @Claire @helene @trwnh Fedibird's specification excludes from view emoji reactions of users who are muted and blocked by the viewer.

   It is not possible to remove specific emoji reactions. federation is difficult.

   I'd like to refer to the implementation there because it has the same problem as the mechanism to reject replies.

   • Embed this notice
     のえる (noellabo@fedibird.com)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Aug-2022 04:28:02 JST のえる

     in reply to

     • Hélène
     • infinite love ⴳ
     • Clairement crevée

     @trwnh @Claire @helene
     That's right... Implements the ability to delete the specified reaction. At this time, if you refer to the EmojiReactions collection of the target Note, the deletion is reflected, so it is reflected remotely by the mechanism to synchronize it. Synchronized works by incentivities on the remote side who want to reflect all reactions. Also, when you delete it, reject Like or EmojiReact in the Reject activity.

   • Embed this notice
     infinite love ⴳ (trwnh@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Aug-2022 04:28:03 JST infinite love ⴳ

     in reply to

     • Hélène
     • Clairement crevée

     @Claire @noellabo @helene could federation of reactions be handled similarly to vote synchronization for in-progress polls?

   • Embed this notice
     Clairement crevée (claire@social.sitedethib.com)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Aug-2022 04:28:05 JST Clairement crevée

     in reply to

     • Hélène
     • infinite love ⴳ

     @noellabo @helene @trwnh right, but i can see figuring out who reacted with offensive/triggering stuff and blocking them may be far more cumbersome than with a reply

     as for rejecting replies, i'm currently drafting a FEP to hopefully address that (though of course it requires third-parties to actually verify it)