Why has Anarchism been historically weaker in conflict than Nationalism when humans inherently want freedom? If anyone knows psychology or history please comment.
#psychology #anarchism #discussion #debate #question #libertarianism
Why has Anarchism been historically weaker in conflict than Nationalism when humans inherently want freedom? If anyone knows psychology or history please comment.
#psychology #anarchism #discussion #debate #question #libertarianism
It's because #Anarchism has oftentimes lacked the organizational structure that's necessary to create mass movements and achieve political power, with exceptions such as Machnovischina and the CNT, but even those attempts failed.
Anarchist authors being censored by both left and right wing states doesn't explain why anarchism has been historically weak when it comes to conflicts, specifically as compared to nationalism, which was the original question I was answering.
@Radical_EgoCom @mutualist I think it is because the approach is too different from what we have now e.g. anarchists authors would be censored by both left and right-wing states (by all possible forms of state management, for that matter).
Of course it's not supported by any state, for obvious reasons, and it not having any structure of power is a problem with anarchism, specifically its rejection of hierarchical organization and coercion, which makes creating a powerful structure significantly harder.
@Radical_EgoCom Because it is not supported by any state and any structure of power in general.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.