Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Saturday, 21-Dec-2024 05:25:51 JST Kevin Beaumont

   There’s rumours flying around social media that Fortinet have another actively exploited zero day in FortiOS, which hasn’t been assigned a CVE again.

   Same cycle - you might want to upgrade to latest release ASAP.

   https://cyberplace.social/@David_Wong/113667058926011031

   • Embed this notice
     Ben Stewart (obsidi88@mstdn.social)'s status on Saturday, 21-Dec-2024 05:46:57 JST Ben Stewart

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog wait, another one? This isn't related to the fortiwlm? This is NEW?

   • Embed this notice
     OSPF110 ☕ (ospf110@cyberplace.social)'s status on Saturday, 21-Dec-2024 06:06:54 JST OSPF110 ☕

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog No it's ok, I didn't really fancy this time off work I'm currently on 🙃

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Sunday, 22-Dec-2024 06:09:00 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Okay, after some amateur reverse engineering - upgrade your FortiGate firewalls to latest version. What’s a pun for Deep Packet Inspection?

   • Embed this notice
     João Tiago Rebelo (NAFO J-121) (jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.pt)'s status on Sunday, 22-Dec-2024 06:47:53 JST João Tiago Rebelo (NAFO J-121)

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog Deep InPack(e)t?

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Sunday, 22-Dec-2024 10:57:47 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Calling this one DerpGate

   • Embed this notice
     Edgar Whelp (edgarwhelp@cyberplace.social)'s status on Sunday, 22-Dec-2024 11:02:16 JST Edgar Whelp

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog DerpiGate has more of a ring to it no? :-)

   • Embed this notice
     Andrew Golding (huronbikes@cyberplace.social)'s status on Sunday, 22-Dec-2024 11:42:19 JST Andrew Golding

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog Derp Pocket Incision?

   • Embed this notice
     CWooWoo (carly@cyberplace.social)'s status on Monday, 23-Dec-2024 23:23:05 JST CWooWoo

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog any more info on this please?

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Monday, 23-Dec-2024 23:54:09 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     As an update to FortiOS thing - fixes are out for all the Fortigate versions except 6.4.x branch which has no fix still.

     End of support versions - 6.2 and below - also vulnerable but no fix as EOL.

     It looks like fix started in branches almost a year ago and hasn't been documented.

     Not terribly exciting and you should probably be eating mince pies instead.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 27-Dec-2024 16:54:39 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     This is similarish to the Fortigate zero day, also being exploited -in case of Fortigate it's a non-management packet which causes FortiOS to run out of memory and enter failopen https://infosec.exchange/@screaminggoat/113722788663656122

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 27-Dec-2024 16:58:59 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Just to widen this out -- I'm aware of a telco which is experiencing denial of service using both vulns, an e-crime group has basically turned up with firewall non-management zero days which is another escalation.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 27-Dec-2024 17:38:40 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     With the Palo-Alto one - if you run the exploit multiple times against a HA pair of Palo-Alto boxes, they both crash and don't reboot. Doesn't matter if you don't present DNSSEC to internet.

   • Embed this notice
     Kal Feher (kalfeher@infosec.exchange)'s status on Friday, 27-Dec-2024 23:01:16 JST Kal Feher

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog unless I misread the cve this isnt related to DNSSEC the protocol extension at all. This is just PA checking dns, logging it and dying bc some bad words made it into the logs.

   • Embed this notice
     Kal Feher (kalfeher@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 28-Dec-2024 00:38:27 JST Kal Feher

     @GossiTheDog yes I think that’s well understood.
     But I wouldn’t conflate DNSSec which is a protocol extension and a subset of dns packet types, with a FW doing dns security things. Perhaps it was inadvertent or from a sloppy release, but for clarity general dns security, should not be referred to as dnssec. That will def confuse ppl

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Saturday, 28-Dec-2024 01:33:25 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     If anybody is dealing with the Palo Alto CVE-2024-3393 situation - they've neglected to mention they haven't yet released updates for the different impacted versions, so the temp mitigation is turn off logging in your anti-spyware policies if update isn't out yet.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Saturday, 28-Dec-2024 01:35:29 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Also, if you want to know what an impacted box looks like, if you attach a cable to it, it looks like this

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Saturday, 28-Dec-2024 01:52:36 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Tired: running network gear made a country with a proven track record in tech orgs can afford

     Wired: rip and replace it with firewalls where a single bad packet can make a box unbootable because we're processing logs like it's 1994

   • Embed this notice
     sortius (sortius@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 28-Dec-2024 05:44:56 JST sortius

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog I get that the consumer gear is shite, and built like Swiss cheese, but how many in that price range aren't?

     Commercial gear, though, seems fairly rock solid

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Saturday, 28-Dec-2024 07:21:10 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Palo Alto updated their advisory, the DoS issue occurs on the Advanced Security license too, not just DNS Security license

     https://infosec.exchange/@cR0w/113727082315316250

   • Embed this notice
     bash0ra (bash0ra@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 28-Dec-2024 20:51:53 JST bash0ra

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog is there such a known issue to fail open a Fortinet Firewall at the moment I have missed?

   • Embed this notice
     Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Sunday, 29-Dec-2024 22:16:35 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog it seems like it ought to be cheaper to just reverse engineer the shit out of the gear to look for issues

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 01:39:40 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     A reminder about this thread for those returning from holiday

     - if you're using Palo Alto firewalls and have DNS Security enabled on anti-spyware policies (you probably do) upgrade to the latest available release (you're running a supported release, right?) as a single DNS packet traversing the data plane (i.e. none management) causes the firewall to fail and fail to boot.

     - if you're using Fortigate firewalls, upgrade to latest release (if on 6.4.15 or below, update to latest 7.x).

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 01:43:00 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     Also, since there's still confusion about the Fortigate issue - no, it isn't CVE-XYZ - no CVE is assigned still and there's still no advisory.

   • Embed this notice
     Kevin Beaumont (gossithedog@cyberplace.social)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Jan-2025 00:11:31 JST Kevin Beaumont

     in reply to

     The FortiGate issue has an advisory now: https://www.fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-24-266

     And a CVE: CVE-2024-46670

     Found by some guys at QI-ANXIN Group

     There’s some eye raising stuff in it but anyhoo, patch. You probably already are since the patches were released a while ago.

     It doesn’t need management interface access, if you can send IKE packets you can send one which triggers the firewall to consume 90% RAM and fail open some traffic and/or crash.

   • Embed this notice
     hal8999 (hal8999@infosec.exchange)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Jan-2025 02:55:23 JST hal8999

     in reply to

     @GossiTheDog Does somebody have a write-up on this?