GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 17:43:24 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

    "Big batteries at home could catch fire! They are a risk!"

    No: "the findings indicate that the probability of an home storage systems (HSS) fire is very low (0.0049 %) and is 50 times lower than for a general house fire."

    "But solar panels catch fire quite often!"

    No: "Compared to the generally low fire probability of an HSS, the probability of PV systems catching fire is a further three times lower"

    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4995517

    In conversation about 6 months ago from social.wildeboer.net permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      Quantitative Fire Risk Assessment of Battery Home Storage Systems in Comparison to General House Fires in Germany and Other Battery Related Fires
      Battery storage systems are becoming an integral part of the energy transition, as they offer the possibility of bridging time windows in which self-generated r
    • Embed this notice
      Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 17:51:19 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:
      in reply to

      (cue the naysayers that will point at what they think are methodical flaws in the preprint. I salute you! Please contact the authors with your criticisms as the preprint needs peer review from experts like you!)

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*) (david_chisnall@infosec.exchange)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 18:02:20 JST David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*) David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)
      in reply to

      @jwildeboer Do you know how these numbers have changed over time? Battery densities have increased, which would naively lead to an increase in fire risk, but the safety designs (especially safely venting pressurised hydrogen that can build up when the cells deteriorate) have also improved. I wonder if there was a period when they were very unsafe, or if it was always just a marketing-driven perception.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Apan (apan@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 19:28:53 JST Apan Apan
      in reply to

      @jwildeboer "The fires in HSS in Germany were determined using web crawling for the year 2023 because no other data was available" ..... Yeah, seams like an reliable method.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Apan (apan@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 19:42:50 JST Apan Apan

      @jwildeboer I would argue that it's up to the authors to do their work, it's not the readers.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 19:42:50 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:
      in reply to
      • Apan

      @Apan It's a preprint, so the authors are interested in peer review. You can find contact details right at the top of the paper if you are interested in making this better. If you only want to criticise and complain, that's also fine. But not something I care about that much :)

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Jesper Larsson (avadeaux@mastodon.nu)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 20:09:49 JST Jesper Larsson Jesper Larsson
      in reply to

      @jwildeboer 0.0049% doesn’t sound low? It should mean that five in a thousand systems catch fire…

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Peter Bindels (dascandy@infosec.exchange)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 20:48:55 JST Peter Bindels Peter Bindels
      in reply to

      @jwildeboer I'm mostly surprised the more common things of "damaged equipment still used", "power extensions used beyond rating" and "outdated house wiring" are not listed.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      dexternemrod (dexternemrod@troet.cafe)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 21:57:05 JST dexternemrod dexternemrod
      in reply to

      @jwildeboer
      I wonder how a wood/coal oven would fit into this chart ...

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Wary Jerry (jerry@infosec.exchange)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 22:45:08 JST Wary Jerry Wary Jerry
      in reply to

      @jwildeboer FWIW, I recently had an albeit non-scientific discussion with the fire marshal of a city about the fire hazard of batteries. My take away from the discussion is that we have to segment the discussion into two - batteries that are made by reputable companies with reasonable safety standards and those that are super cheap (he mentioned buying through Alibaba as being problematic, but guessing both good and bad can be bought there but that people shopping there tend to look for the cheapest thing with the specs they want)

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      robloblaw (robloblaw@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 23:37:43 JST robloblaw robloblaw
      in reply to
      • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

      @david_chisnall @jwildeboer
      The huge variability in quality of lithium batteries for smaller emobility devices may contribute. Scooters and ebikes are burning down houses frequently enough for fire departments to be warning of the risk.

      BYD hybrids are notorious for catching fire, as are some of the EVs LGChem supplied batteries for.

      These are hopefully just teething problems of an industry rapid developing.

      For stationary storage, LFP chemistries are extremely safe.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      robloblaw (robloblaw@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 11-Dec-2024 01:26:55 JST robloblaw robloblaw
      • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

      @jwildeboer @david_chisnall
      https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-08-25/nsw-battery-fires-fire-and-rescue-government-standards/104251516
      "The department has referred to battery fires as "the fastest growing fire risk" in the state and people are four times more likely to be injured by a fire that originates from a lithium-ion battery than other sources."

      https://news.dfes.wa.gov.au/media-releases-feature-stories/media-release-spike-in-battery-fires-sparks-warning/
      “Since 2020, structure fires caused by lithium-ion batteries have increased in Western Australia by more than 85 per cent,” Commissioner Klemm said.

      https://youtube.com/watch?v=t0MvsuYf91g

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: live-production.wcms.abc-cdn.net.au
        'Fastest-growing fire risk': Exploding everyday items now 'top issue' for fire authorities
        from https://www.abc.net.au/news/jesse-hyland/103104246
        New South Wales has reported 185 lithium ion battery fires up until August this year, with more than six battery fires per week. Fire and Rescue NSW has referred to battery fires as "the fastest growing fire risk" in the state.
      2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: news.dfes.wa.gov.au
        Media Release: Spike in battery fires sparks warning
    • Embed this notice
      robloblaw (robloblaw@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 11-Dec-2024 01:26:55 JST robloblaw robloblaw
      in reply to
      • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

      @jwildeboer @david_chisnall
      My comment was in response to "I wonder if there was a period when they were very unsafe, or if it was always just a marketing-driven perception."

      There is an accurate perception of some small lithium ion batteries being dangerous due to poor quality and regulation. Same with SOME EVs.

      This perception bleeds over into large house batteries, which are much better constructed, tested, and regulated. Sorry I was unclear.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      robloblaw (robloblaw@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 11-Dec-2024 01:26:55 JST robloblaw robloblaw
      in reply to
      • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

      @jwildeboer @david_chisnall

      Byd hybrid fires
      https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ht9MuTYXsTE
      1:13

      It's the ICE components causing fires. So again, it is a perception issue, with bad faith actors spreading FUD.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. BYD facing major reliability problems in China as customer complaints skyrocket
        from The Electric Viking
        BYD facing major reliability problems in China as customer complaints skyrocket👇👇 The Electric Viking store/merchandise 👇👇https://shop.theelectricviking....
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 11-Dec-2024 15:01:19 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      @jwildeboer Generally house files can be put out with a fire hose just fine - while good luck putting out a huge LiCoO₂ battery (it's only common for shoddily made batteries to deflagrate, but even batteries from reputable manufacturers have been known for manufacturing defects and therefore are prone to catching fire).

      Although, you can go with LiFePO₄ batteries instead, which are much safer, almost never catch fire and tend to burn gently rather than deflagrating.
      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.