Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

Conversation

Notices

Embed this notice
silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Dec-2024 06:03:46 JST silverpill

Iceshrimp.NET has a section titled "FEPs we intend to support in the future" in their FEDERATION.md:
https://iceshrimp.dev/iceshrimp/Iceshrimp.NET/src/branch/dev/FEDERATION.md#feps-we-intend-to-support-in-the-future
Streams: "Fediverse FEPs we will not ever support"
https://codeberg.org/streams/streams/src/branch/release/FEDERATION.md#fediverse-feps-we-will-not-ever-support
NodeBB has a similar page in their documentation where position towards various FEPs is indicated using words "positive", "neutral", "defer", and "negative":
https://docs.nodebb.org/activitypub/fep/
I think this is a good practice.
In conversation about a month ago from mitra.social permalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: iceshrimp.dev
  
  Iceshrimp.NET
  
  from iceshrimp
  
  This repository contains our efforts to rewrite both the backend and the frontend, to improve performance, stability and maintainability.
3. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: codeberg.org
  
  streams/FEDERATION.md at release
  
  from streams
  
  streams - Consent based public domain federated communications server. Provides a feature rich ActivityPub and Nomad communication node.

Feeds