the problem is i think. if a linux distro was actually good enough, it would annihilate all the other distros. and that would go against the whole point of there being distros. so theyre not allowed to make a distro thats good. they're not allowed to be like "look we're actually gonna do it this time, we're gonna make the one true linux", they'd get tomatoes thrown at them. they can only make a distro thats "okay, but then in 5 years it Goes Wrong and everybody hops to the next popular distro"
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
josef (jk@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 29-Nov-2024 12:35:55 JST josef - 👾 radhitya repeated this.
-
Embed this notice
smxi (smxi@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 29-Nov-2024 12:35:54 JST smxi @jk the reason there are different distros is they meet different needs.
RHEL: corporate linux
Fedora: unpaid dev for rhel
Arch: true rolling, minimal package changes from upstream
#Slackware you are expert, want vanilla upstream, patrick v. BDFL
#Debian install once run forever. Really. Sid/testing semi-rolling
Ubuntu: swahili for "can't install debian"TinyCore: 26 MiB full OS install to RAM. Really.
#Alpine very groovy tech
Mint: new user choice 1
SLED/SUSE: Not rh
And so on.
-
Embed this notice
👾 radhitya (al1r4d@pegelinux.top)'s status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 12:46:31 JST 👾 radhitya @rvyhvn My experience with Void Linux in the past was good; blazzing fast with runit.
-
Embed this notice
hanshi (rvyhvn@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 12:46:33 JST hanshi