@tehstu @josephcox I'm pretty critical of Bluesky (see my timeline) but I don't see why this would be any harder or slower to do from Mastodon/fedi
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Tom Walker (tomw@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 11:39:05 JST Tom Walker -
Embed this notice
Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 11:39:04 JST Evan Prodromou @tomw @tehstu @josephcox all Bluesky data is public. Many ActivityPub posts are private, followers-only or DMs.
-
Embed this notice
Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 23:56:06 JST Strypey @mcv
> Is follower-only a thing on ActivityPub?Yes. They're called Followers posts in Mastodon now.
> I thought everything was unencrypted and basically accessible to any server that receives it.
Yes. There's been all sorts of research into things like Object Capabilities, that could force receiving servers to do what they're told. But for now, not displaying Specific People posts publicly, or showing Followers(-only) posts only to followers, is an unenforceable handshake agreement.
Hyolobrika likes this. -
Embed this notice
mcv (mcv@friendica.opensocial.space)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 23:56:08 JST mcv @evan
Is follower-only a thing on ActivityPub? I thought everything was unencrypted and basically accessible to any server that receives it.
-
Embed this notice