Good news: The Dell firmware update utility definitely checks whether update executables are signed.
Bad news: Dell is posting unsigned update executables to their website labeled “critical” which then fail to install due to the good news
Good news: The Dell firmware update utility definitely checks whether update executables are signed.
Bad news: Dell is posting unsigned update executables to their website labeled “critical” which then fail to install due to the good news
@0xabad1dea @phil Telemetry is not needed here at all. The failure would be detected if they even tested the update on a single machine they owned. No need to look at machines they don't own.
@phil 100%, there should always be a chance to say no to telemetry but even if only a fraction of users consent, the 100% failure rate among reporters should be quickly raising a huge red flag somewhere
This firmware update has been periodically failing since I got this laptop from work several weeks ago, and only today did I put in the effort to track down where it was hiding the logs with the real reason. This suggests that not only do they have a process issue that meant an unsigned update got posted, but they have no ability to detect that there’s a 100% failure rate to install after downloading it
@0xabad1dea People keep being upset about "telemetry". But that's the kind of telemetry that you'd want as someone pushing software to people.
@0xabad1dea @phil "Telemetry" is *always* outsourcing your testing expenses onto your users/customers.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.