Program notably has zero information on how the payout is calculated, but does go out of its way to say they can change it any time for any reason https://web.archive.org/web/20230805044414/https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/creator-ads-revenue-sharing
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Reed Mideke (reedmideke@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 21-Nov-2024 06:17:21 JST Reed Mideke -
Embed this notice
Reed Mideke (reedmideke@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 21-Nov-2024 06:17:22 JST Reed Mideke LOL "We need a bit more time to review everything for the next payout and aim to get all eligible accounts paid as soon as possible"
Wonder if they found people trying to game the system, or the first payments were just ad-hoc and they're having trouble making the numbers work
https://www.theverge.com/2023/8/4/23820859/x-twitter-ad-sharing-payment-unpaid-delay-elon-musk
In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
Reed Mideke (reedmideke@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 21-Nov-2024 06:17:24 JST Reed Mideke Sadly, sounds like CA anti-SLAPP law will not apply to the SLAPP against CCDH https://www.techdirt.com/2023/08/01/free-speech-absolutist-elon-musk-files-obvious-slapp-suit-against-non-profit-critic/
In conversation permalink Attachments
-
Embed this notice
Reed Mideke (reedmideke@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 21-Nov-2024 06:17:25 JST Reed Mideke This actually makes sense in a round about way: Paying for features you want is a lot more reasonable than paying for a symbol identifying you as having $8 and a phone number… but that's sure not how they pitched it
In conversation permalink
-
Embed this notice