Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Hyolobrika (hyolobrika@social.fbxl.net)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Nov-2024 14:38:12 JST Hyolobrika

   • on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ
   @lain Violent or just "I hate X group"? Because that makes a huge difference if you ask me.
   • Embed this notice
     on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ (lain@lain.com)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Nov-2024 14:38:10 JST on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

     in reply to

     • Taylan
     @taylan @Hyolobrika none of this would be illegal anyway because it was in private.
   • Embed this notice
     Taylan (taylan@fedi.feministwiki.org)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Nov-2024 14:38:11 JST Taylan

     in reply to

     • on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ
     @Hyolobrika @lain
     
     She probably denied the Holocaust, said that the Nazis were right, and that there should be an ethnic cleansing.
     
     I think that's like the main three categories of illegal speech in Germany.
     
     If that's a real story and not something the redditor made up then I don't know what to say. Seems extremely stupid in every way, LOL.
   • Embed this notice
     on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ (lain@lain.com)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Nov-2024 21:30:32 JST on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

     in reply to

     • Taylan
     @taylan @Hyolobrika
     > "Wer in einer Weise, die geeignet ist, den öffentlichen Frieden zu stören [...]"
     
     If it can't disturb public peace, it's not illegal. A message exchanged between two lovers with the explicit wish for it to remain secret is not that.
   • Embed this notice
     Taylan (taylan@fedi.feministwiki.org)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Nov-2024 21:30:33 JST Taylan

     in reply to

     • on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ
     @lain @Hyolobrika
     
     :blobcat-think3:
     
     How exactly is "private" defined?
     
     Filming it and sending it to someone could be considered public, no? She "published" it to someone, technically? IANAL