Conversation

@UlrikeHahn @felwert @vbuendiar @ide Completely abusurd. Nowhere I claimed or implied they should be *compelled* to do anything. My discourse is anti-authoritatian, if you haven't noticed.

I'm arguing why they *should* do something, not only because it would lead to a better outcome, but it would also be more consistent with their allegded goals and principles.

I'm criticizing, not calling the police.

You're using a double standard: to defend their decisions you evoke the common good, to defend against criticisms you evoke their right to do what they please, regardless of consistency, or what others think. You can't have both ways.