@jay_peper @alilly I would argue that "hackers hacked <Some Service>" is effectively a thinly veiled passive voice anyway.
The "hackers" are, after all, implied. Nobody *actually* knows anything about them – beyond the fact that if there was a compromise, there "had to" necessarily be some "hackers" involved.
I've seen someone actually claim the above with a straight face when asked why they added "hackers" to a news item about a statement that did not include that term…