#GoodNews from the EU: "The quarterly figures showed considerable progress in the clean energy transition with 52% of Q2 2024 electricity production generated by renewables, with fossil generation falling significantly to 24% (relative to 46% and 30% respectively in Q2 2023). Solar and wind registered a 14% rise in generation in Q2 2024 (+18 TWh)." ... 1/2
... "Onshore wind generation rose by 6% (+5 TWh) while offshore wind generation surged by 37% (+4 TWh). Solar generation rose by 20% (+14 TWh) and hydropower improved its output by 21% (+18 TWh)." Source: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/data-and-analysis/market-analysis_en
Why did I do all of this work today to post data on energy generation and consumption in the EU? Because it matters, IMHO. The media with its clickbait obsession could give you a very wrong impression about the energy market. We are progressing towards more renewables and continuously reducing our dependency on fossil fuels. Electricity generation with coal, lignite, gas, and oil generation falling by 7 TWh (-26%), 5 TWh (-13%), 19 TWh (-24%), and 0.3 TWh (-10%) is A Good Thing! 4/4
@jwildeboer Sei mir nicht böse, aber es ist sehr viel, dass dieses Graphik nicht wiedergibt (z.B woher das ganze Hydro kommt, wenn Europa keine neue Flüsse hat... 😇 ). Deshalb sind die Kritiken berechtigt und Teil der Diskussion.
Einst bin ich aber bereit zu erkennen (doch! 😀): dieses Graphik hier zeigt eindeutig, dass Europa jetzt weniger Strom aus fossile Quellen erzeugt. Und das ist das Einzige, dass wirklicht zählt. Egal, ob es eingespart oder solar erzeugt wird.
@dl2jml Your first criticism was that my posted graph doesn't give much details on hydropower. So I gave more. Hydropower is BTW quite old, the installed capacity hasn't changed that dramatically over the years, so no new rivers needed. Exsting plants have been updated to better and more efficient turbines.
@jwildeboer It was not a criticism, just a remark. And I thanked you for the graphic about hydropower. And yes: Europe has made progresses in hydropower and also uses it as storage which is a necessity the more energy is produced via solar and wind.
@icanbob Sure is. One good indicator is the rather chaotic negative electricity price hours that are the result of renewables flooding the grid and "classic" fossile fuel plants needing too long to shut down. See https://social.wildeboer.net/@jwildeboer/113460370133313786
@jwildeboer We have to treat these stories with caution. Aggregate renewable electrical generation stats by themselves are problematic. The relative timing of electron supply and electron load is much more important.
@jwildeboer@gunstick There is one worry about negative electricity prices on sunny days, though - the export rate that some suppliers pay for domestically generated solar energy might become unsustainable.
@Flo_Rian@jwildeboer@gunstick I've already got a battery that time-shifts from day to night. I don't see one on offer (at any price!) for domestic installations that time-shifts from summer to winter.
@TimWardCam I'd disagree ;) Going through the report yesterday and diving a bit deeper into the numbers has showed me that we made a lot of progress. I wasn't aware of that. So it made me feel better and gave me the feeling that while we can (and must) do even more, we also already did a lot. @Flo_Rian@gunstick
@Flo_Rian I'm thinking slightly different. With renewables and (hyper-)local storage capacities (battery, hydropower, and, yes, mobile storage via Vehicle to grid with electric cars) we can create microgrids for urban/rural areas the result in more or less free electricity for households. Which allows us to build better grids for industry purposes as the "one size fits all" grid approach is not really working anymore. @TimWardCam@gunstick
@jwildeboer@TimWardCam@gunstick My take: Once we equalize supply and demand during the day, electricity costs are so low during peak solar and wind months it makes economical sense to run electrolysers 24/7 during these times and store it as H2/synthetic methane/ammonia.