Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Özkan Pakdil 🦖 (thejvmbender@techhub.social)'s status on Thursday, 31-Oct-2024 22:44:56 JST Özkan Pakdil 🦖

   • Evan Prodromou

   @evan why no Government option ? 🥳 more the marrier

   • Embed this notice
     Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Thursday, 31-Oct-2024 22:44:56 JST Evan Prodromou

     in reply to

     @thejvmbender That's an interesting question and should probably be a different poll. Are you thinking that there'd be a single government entity that ran the whole Fediverse?

   • Embed this notice
     Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Friday, 01-Nov-2024 02:18:21 JST Evan Prodromou

     in reply to

     @thejvmbender I don't understand why this made you vote "Strong yes". Just to spoil the results?

   • Embed this notice
     Özkan Pakdil 🦖 (thejvmbender@techhub.social)'s status on Friday, 01-Nov-2024 02:18:22 JST Özkan Pakdil 🦖

     in reply to

     • Evan Prodromou

     @evan it was a joke, you take it seriously thanks for that, I do not believe any company should control social web, but I voted `strong yes` because I think this question is wrong.

     If we start controlling social web, then it should go to ethics and government and education. Why a company control any area on web, I do not understand.

     Btw I took company as in capitalism company a firm. If we are talking about as in group of people then again this question I do not understand, why a group of people should control over social web.