Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Stefano Zacchiroli (zacchiro@mastodon.xyz)'s status on Saturday, 26-Oct-2024 05:47:00 JST Stefano Zacchiroli

   Very happy to have contributed to this: "SFC Announces Aspirational Statement on #LLM -backed generative #AI for Programming" https://sfconservancy.org/news/2024/oct/25/aspirational-on-llm-generative-ai-programming/ #freesoftware #opensource

   • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Saturday, 26-Oct-2024 05:50:50 JST Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:

     in reply to
     @zacchiro > The system is built using only FOSS, and is used only for the creation of FOSS, and never for proprietary software.
     
     Well… how would that be enforced though? And it would break quite few sections of the Open Source Definition, specially "License Must Not Restrict Other Software".
     fu likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Ludovic Courtès (civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr)'s status on Sunday, 27-Oct-2024 11:27:46 JST Ludovic Courtès

     in reply to

     @zacchiro I think a question to ask first is whether generative-AI-assisted programming should be supported at all.

     First because it’s technically and scientifically ridiculous to rely on statistically plausible code.

     But more importantly because of the environmental disaster it contributes to.

     Can we, as passionate as we are about free software, just say “no, we won’t play this game”?

     Alexandre Oliva likes this.