Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Friday, 25-Oct-2024 03:05:10 JST djsumdog

   in reply to

   • Killer*Mule

   I like the off-guardian's take on it:

   https://off-guardian.org/2024/10/08/careful-talk-of-weather-modification-could-be-a-trap/

   Personally, I see reason to be cautious here. Does the ruling class have access to such technology? Very possibly. I’m extremely positive they’ve spent billions in research trying to create it anyhow. Would they use it if they had it? Of course they would. Obviously they would have no moral objections to causing death and destruction in pursuit of their agenda. No, my caution is simple – the claim of “weather modification” can easily be used as a backdoor into accepting the reality of “climate change”. After all its premise is the same – that the weather we experience is unusual, strange, unnatural – and we need to do something about it.

   • Embed this notice
     Killer*Mule (killer_mule@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 25-Oct-2024 03:05:11 JST Killer*Mule

     NOAA debunking itself, ignoring actual patents exist for weather modification. One claim says, The government blah blah blah... with a Fact that states NOAA does not.... awww, I didn't say green light, I said green might....word games....

     https://www.noaa.gov/news/fact-check-debunking-weather-modification-claims