This "AI licensing" scheme is quite simply a protection racket. "Nice IP you've got there, would hate to have something scrape it..."
There's no need for this "licensing" chicanery. What's needed are *consequences for the thefts*.
This "AI licensing" scheme is quite simply a protection racket. "Nice IP you've got there, would hate to have something scrape it..."
There's no need for this "licensing" chicanery. What's needed are *consequences for the thefts*.
Again, "AI" theftbros KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING WAS THEFT. That's why they pointed their plagiarism machines at piracy sites. The entire "AI" nonsense is irretrievably and irreversibly tainted--and that's leaving aside the ecological devastation.
I am utterly disgusted. I don't want a "licensing" protection racket run by the same Silicon Valley theftbros who stole my work in the first place. I want *consequences for those who stole*, and *regulation of the spicy autocorrect machines*.
Wow, the Author's Guild is really quadrupling (or quintupling?) down and doing a full-court press for the "AI licensing" protection racket with this "Made By Humans" startup. I just got a notification in my inbox for a Zoom meeting this week--"Understanding AI Licensing For Authors".
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.