@unmind honestly mine still needs a lot of work but ive been having fun reading some stuff thats a bit too hard for me lmao. the only thing ive read that id say is like, at my actual reading level is the sanskrit version of the heart sutra which is like rlly dead simple grammatically
@unmind it's abhinavagupta's bhagavadgītārthasaṃgraha meow. i think theres at least one english translation of it now but we're gonna read it in sanskrit
@unmind one more fun fact then i promise ill stop 🙏 preclassical (so like, vedic and epic) sanskrit didn't have a formal/informal distinction in the 2nd person and the epics were what i was rlly interested in when i started, but by the height of classical sanskrit literature that distinction had developed and then the informal 2nd person had all but died out and u basically only get the formal (which is gramatically 3rd person like in lots of other languages) so i was super confused when i started looking at stuff made for learning classical sanskrit and saw these totally different 2nd person pronouns that didnt use the 2nd person forms i knew
@unmind i love all the inflections in sanskrit and all the cool compounds u can form. the grammatical feature thats my favorite is pretty silly but it’s the converb form in -tvā or -ya (depending on whether the verb has a prepositional prefix or not) like in śloka 2 line 2 of chapter 1 of the gita u get
आचार्यम् उपसंगम्य राजा वचनम् अब्रवीत्
where उपसंगम्य upsaṃgamya expresses “having approached,” in 1 inflected verb form. i just rlly like how it sounds meow. especially w/ the verb कृ kṛ (like in karma) where u get the form कृत्वा kṛtvā “having done/made/caused”
@emmycelium sanskrit would be so good for me to learn but it has simply never made my brain go brrr in the way chinese and japanese do so i'm always studying buddhism in translation