Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Monday, 14-Oct-2024 22:04:29 JST SuperDicq

   • The Original Stripey Goodness
   • The Stallman report

   @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social "known sex pest"
   
   Having some controversial political opinions and that one Betsy story from 45 years ago are pretty far from being a sex pest.

   • 翠星石 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Tuesday, 15-Oct-2024 21:21:01 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Ludovic Archivist Lagouardette
     • The Original Stripey Goodness
     • The Stallman report

     @Archivist@social.linux.pizza @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social First of all you have more than doubled the amount of comments mentioned in the report which is 124.
     
     And you should note that these are comments (speech) from political notes and mailing lists, not actions. They are just (although I agree often shortsighted) opinions, some of which have been retracted.

   • Embed this notice
     Ludovic Archivist Lagouardette (archivist@social.linux.pizza)'s status on Tuesday, 15-Oct-2024 21:21:02 JST Ludovic Archivist Lagouardette

     in reply to

     • The Original Stripey Goodness
     • The Stallman report

     @SuperDicq @stripey @report_press

     I am pretty sure that a report grouping 250 occurrences over 20 years (that is around 1 per month) is factual enough to warrant more than a glimpse of attention and action

   • Embed this notice
     Ludovic Archivist Lagouardette (archivist@social.linux.pizza)'s status on Tuesday, 15-Oct-2024 23:31:04 JST Ludovic Archivist Lagouardette

     in reply to

     • The Original Stripey Goodness
     • The Stallman report

     @SuperDicq @stripey @report_press

     7 of 250 have been retracted

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Tuesday, 15-Oct-2024 23:41:41 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Ludovic Archivist Lagouardette
     • The Original Stripey Goodness
     • The Stallman report

     @Archivist@social.linux.pizza @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social Ok I read the table wrong in my initial post, the 124 amount is used to make a different point. The total amount of "problematic" statements mentioned by the report is 178.
     
     Where are you getting the number 250 from?
     
     I also I do not agree with only 7 statements being retracted. If one statement in a category has been retracted, he should be given the benefit of the doubt that all the other statements in the same category should be retracted as well.
     
     So if you really want to do this mathematically I would say that given some benefit of the doubt the retractions count for 108 out of 178 mentioned statements.
     
     The remaining 70 statements that the 3 categories that he report calls "Support for CSAM/bestiality/necrophilia".
     
     The names of these categories are really misleading, because they are mostly just about possession of material, not about support for the actual acts of abusing children/animals/corpses.