Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Sick Sun (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Sunday, 13-Oct-2024 05:11:07 JST Sick Sun > Is there any possibility of hope that a result of this is a more usable archive.org with less reliance on js?
can you focus on the attack please and not pester the AI people about how much you hate webpages with javascript-
Embed this notice
Vitor Hugo (vhns@yuga.surf)'s status on Sunday, 13-Oct-2024 05:25:31 JST Vitor Hugo @sun according to what they released part of the attack relied on a vulnerability on a JavaScript library. A lower reliance on js *could* lower the chances of such an event recurring. In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Sunday, 13-Oct-2024 05:28:54 JST feld @vhns @sun they said they completely removed that library and the attack came back. In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ (lain@lain.com)'s status on Sunday, 13-Oct-2024 09:14:35 JST on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ @sun what would the largest collection of human digital artifacts even need js for? they just statically generate a gemini site. In conversation permalink Sick Sun likes this. -
Embed this notice
Linux Walt (@lnxw37j1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864} (lnxw37j1@gnusocial.jp)'s status on Sunday, 13-Oct-2024 09:44:26 JST Linux Walt (@lnxw37j1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864} @lain @sun
LOL. It is that way so you can't block their on-site tracker. Before they ran the tracker, the site wasn't javascrippled.In conversation permalink Sick Sun likes this.
-
Embed this notice