If you don't understand this statement, skip the poll.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Saturday, 21-Sep-2024 21:47:50 JST Evan Prodromou
-
Embed this notice
FinchHaven (finchhaven@infosec.exchange)'s status on Sunday, 22-Sep-2024 11:46:40 JST FinchHaven
That's pretty condescending
One can understand the statement, and not support it
Which includes not supporting a poll that, tacitly, supports the current background behind the statement
-
Embed this notice
Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Sunday, 22-Sep-2024 11:46:40 JST Evan Prodromou
@FinchHaven I agree, one can understand the statement and not support it.
If someone doesn't understand the statement, that's OK. It's a very specific issue for a very small group of developers and architects working on the ActivityPub network. People shouldn't feel bad if they don't understand.
Also, I don't think you're correct in your assumptions about my biases.
-
Embed this notice
Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Sunday, 22-Sep-2024 11:48:10 JST Evan Prodromou
@FinchHaven I think most people on the Fediverse could understand the issue if it was explained clearly, but I think that would reveal more of my thoughts about the issue than would be fair for a poll. Also, I just finished writing a book about ActivityPub, so I want to take a weekend off from explaining the protocol!
-
Embed this notice