I completely agree with you. But the reality is that the United States has always been the key decision-maker in NATO. Being the biggest power gives you that privilege. And I don't think the Biden administration is the only ones that doesn't want Ukraine to completely crush the Russian Federation. There are other countries that have been rather wishy-washy when it comes to a Ukrainian victory. It's more of a Ukraine mustn't lose policy.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Viking Chieftain (vikingchieftain@krigskunst.social)'s status on Sunday, 15-Sep-2024 21:24:59 JST Viking Chieftain - NeonPurpleStar :heart_bi: likes this.
-
Embed this notice
LindaMarie (lindamarie@toad.social)'s status on Sunday, 15-Sep-2024 21:25:00 JST LindaMarie I think it’s probably Burns/Sullivan. They don’t want to defeat russia. Biden isn’t likely (or able?) to decide on 🇺🇦 victory as an objective now, on his way out. It’s bad enough that this policy has cost so many lives and environmental catastrophes. But the fact that my president and his advisers are successful in preventing others from allowing 🇺🇦 to defeat the enemy is maddening.
-
Embed this notice
Viking Chieftain (vikingchieftain@krigskunst.social)'s status on Sunday, 15-Sep-2024 21:25:01 JST Viking Chieftain Sure, the victory plan is to force the Russians to leave Ukraine either through economic collapse or battlefield losses. Now, no more excuses, Biden/Sullivan... let's hit targets inside Russia with every weapon provided.
-
Embed this notice
MAKS 23 👀🇺🇦 (maks23@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 15-Sep-2024 21:25:02 JST MAKS 23 👀🇺🇦 🇬🇧🚀 Five former defence secretaries and an ex-prime minister have urged Starmer to allow Ukraine to use Storm Shadow missiles to strike inside Russia — even without US backing, - The Times
🇺🇸 Biden and his team signalled that they want to go into a “holding pattern” until Zelensky has presented his “victory plan” — before giving their approval for attacks inside Russia.