Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
@kura @grillchen I kind of fail to see how unicode helps, specially as then you'd need to somehow type it (good luck with that) or copy-paste it (so as annoying as a file).
In fact reusing unicode seems quite worse, it's an existing symbol with meaning (either typography or well… freemasons), so text-to-speech / search engines / … aren't going to recognise it as Fediverse, unlike say :fediverse: (which you can image-search).
-
Embed this notice
@lanodan @grillchen @kura If not being in Unicode is such a big issue, why not submit a proposal to incorporate the symbol to the Unicode consortium? Don't they have a process to literally do that?
-
Embed this notice
@Aeder @grillchen @kura Indeed they do. Although it's more for common symbols used by multiple or large communities.
Like wouldn't make sense to have BSD, Linux, OSI, GNU, … logos in Unicode.
-
Embed this notice
@Aeder @grillchen @kura Mere federation is another concept, specially as a lot of networks are federated (email, xmpp, matrix, …) yet aren't part of the fediverse (or well in xmpp case at least not directly, you get bridges instead).
-
Embed this notice
@lanodan @grillchen @kura Mmm, I see what you mean, but you could always submit this symbol to mean "Fediverse"/"Federated Software" rather than any specific project, right?
-
Embed this notice
@Aeder @grillchen @lanodan @kura "federated social network" might be acceptable but then any software could use that. I helped submit the CC license module icons to Unicode and the line between "is a specific logotype" and "represents a concept" is one that they didn't want to blur.