Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Fish of Rage (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 08-Aug-2024 22:55:14 JST Fish of Rage
   Also AWS was never cheaper. You’re paying for the privilege of being able to scale up and down your usage dynamically like a spigot of water. And for managed services that abstract away complexity of scalable tools like nosql db
   • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: and Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem: like this.
   • Embed this notice
     Fish of Rage (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 08-Aug-2024 23:03:21 JST Fish of Rage

     in reply to

     • zonk
     @nosleep I have built full applications on lambda and s3 that had no running costs at all and the usage was below the limit for free lambda requests. (Still paid pennies a month for s3 storage though)
   • Embed this notice
     zonk (nosleep@bae.st)'s status on Thursday, 08-Aug-2024 23:03:22 JST zonk

     in reply to
     @sun i think lambda functions are the closest you can get to cost savings on the cloud. ive played around with them before and for small projects they're actually perfect
     Fish of Rage likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     тняэдт™ (threat@ryona.agency)'s status on Thursday, 08-Aug-2024 23:19:22 JST тняэдт™

     in reply to

     • zonk
     @sun @nosleep there's quite a few clever people shoehorning things into lambda/faas to save money. some it is absurd yet creative
     Fish of Rage likes this.