Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   dilbert 1 (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 08-Aug-2024 22:55:14 JST dilbert 1
   Also AWS was never cheaper. You’re paying for the privilege of being able to scale up and down your usage dynamically like a spigot of water. And for managed services that abstract away complexity of scalable tools like nosql db
   • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: and Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem: like this.
   • Embed this notice
     dilbert 1 (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 08-Aug-2024 23:03:21 JST dilbert 1

     in reply to

     • zonk
     @nosleep I have built full applications on lambda and s3 that had no running costs at all and the usage was below the limit for free lambda requests. (Still paid pennies a month for s3 storage though)
   • Embed this notice
     zonk (nosleep@bae.st)'s status on Thursday, 08-Aug-2024 23:03:22 JST zonk

     in reply to
     @sun i think lambda functions are the closest you can get to cost savings on the cloud. ive played around with them before and for small projects they're actually perfect
     dilbert 1 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     тняэдт™ (threat@ryona.agency)'s status on Thursday, 08-Aug-2024 23:19:22 JST тняэдт™

     in reply to

     • zonk
     @sun @nosleep there's quite a few clever people shoehorning things into lambda/faas to save money. some it is absurd yet creative
     dilbert 1 likes this.