Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

Conversation

Notices

Embed this notice
Sick Sun (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Sunday, 04-Aug-2024 20:25:05 JST Sick Sun

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-5624-per-object-reply-control-policies/2723/50

I don't know, after skimming this thread this seems like a nightmare.
In conversation about 4 months ago from shitposter.world permalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: socialhub.activitypub.rocks
  
  FEP-5624: Per-object reply control policies
  
  The followers collection has special behaviour, yes; but in terms of delivery it’s not really any different from any other arbitrary collection. The fact that most servers don’t allow creation of or addressing to arbitrary collections is irrelevant to the protocol semantics here, if that makes sense? Semantically it can be modeled that way, but similarly follow request semantics aside there’s no reason you can’t model following someone as {Add, object: personImFollowing, target: myFollowersCo...
- Embed this notice
  :blank: (i@declin.eu)'s status on Sunday, 04-Aug-2024 20:30:41 JST :blank:
  in reply to
  
  @sun where are all the feps for more federation instead of less federation
  
  In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
  
  Sick Sun likes this.
- Embed this notice
  feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Sunday, 04-Aug-2024 23:59:22 JST feld
  in reply to
  
  @sun the FEP summary mentions "reply guys" which is the first sign this wasn't professionally written.
  
  In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
  
  Sick Sun likes this.

Public

Conversation

Notices

Feeds