Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Annalee Newitz 🍜 (annaleen@wandering.shop)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 03:01:07 JST Annalee Newitz 🍜

   • Evan Prodromou

   @evan why not both?

   • Embed this notice
     Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 03:01:06 JST Evan Prodromou

     in reply to

     @annaleen those are the "mostly" choices.

   • Embed this notice
     Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 04:40:26 JST Evan Prodromou

     in reply to

     @annaleen duly noted!

   • Embed this notice
     Annalee Newitz 🍜 (annaleen@wandering.shop)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 04:40:27 JST Annalee Newitz 🍜

     in reply to

     • Evan Prodromou

     @evan here is my vote for "both quick and fair," mixed equally. Also "fairness" in US elections is hard to measure anyway, since all our processes are designed to undermine the popular vote and give power to appointed delegates

   • Embed this notice
     Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 10:33:58 JST Evan Prodromou

     in reply to

     • therieau

     @therieau @annaleen
     There are two options where you can say they're both important.

     You can say which is more important to you by saying mostly quick or mostly fair.

   • Embed this notice
     therieau (therieau@bitbang.social)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 10:33:59 JST therieau

     in reply to

     • Evan Prodromou

     @annaleen @evan I'm with Annalee here. I hope it's quick and I'll have to take it on faith that it'll be fair.