Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

Conversation

Notices

Embed this notice
James Gleick (jamesgleick@zirk.us)'s status on Monday, 22-Jul-2024 06:12:42 JST James Gleick

Naturally the press (this is the NY Times editorial board) wants a Democratic clusterfuck now. It would be boring for everyone to get behind the proven Vice President and the candidate who is already on the ticket. “Dems in Disarray” is everyone’s favorite headline.
I don’t think so. I think for once the Dems are going to get this right.
#KamelaHarris
In conversation about a year ago from zirk.us permalink
Attachments
1. NY Times editorial: “Nonetheless, party delegates should have a voice in a decision of this consequence. There are other qualified Democrats who could take on Mr. Trump and win, and picking a candidate without a real contest is how the party got into a position of anointing a standard-bearer that large majorities of Democrats and independents had profound concerns about. While the hour is late, there is still time to put leading candidates through a process of public scrutiny”
  https://cdn.masto.host/zirkus/media_attachments/files/112/826/217/269/976/251/original/44f05df552dc37de.png

Feeds