Since it's come up on other platforms again, here's your semi-annual reminder that the term "Vulnerable Road User," or #VRU, is a #transportation catchall for "humans not safely ensconsed inside a motor vehicle," and it's lazy, inaccurate, offensive, and counterproductive.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Tab Combs (drtcombs@transportation.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Jul-2024 22:07:23 JST Tab Combs -
Embed this notice
Tab Combs (drtcombs@transportation.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Jul-2024 22:07:22 JST Tab Combs Vulnerability is not an intrinsic characteristic of anyone. It's a condition imposed on people by their environments (be those environments physical, social, economic, political, etc).
#VulnerableRoadUser language dehumanizes and makes it easy to shift blame and responsibility off those causing harm and onto those receiving it.
#CarBrain #RoadSafety #VisionZero (2/4)
Bø!rge repeated this. -
Embed this notice
Tab Combs (drtcombs@transportation.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Jul-2024 22:07:22 JST Tab Combs The term #VRU implies that being in danger (e.g., in danger of being hit by someone driving a car on a poorly designed street) is a condition the 'vulnerable user' opted in to.
#VulnerableRoadUser is used to define people ouside of cars according to the dangers imposed by cars and the people who drive, design, and cater to cars.
It's textbook #VictimBlaming, characterizing people as vulnerable because they dare exist in public without a #car.
#CarBrain #RoadSafety #VisionZero (3/4)
-
Embed this notice