Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 01-Jul-2024 23:51:10 JST Bread up, Bro
   For people that don't know about the case that overturned Chevron: this is a pretty quick explanation of it. What is wild is that these idiots couldn't constrain themselves for like 40 years.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 01-Jul-2024 23:55:37 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to
     whats insane is this is what progressives that believe in a managerial state actually think.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 01-Jul-2024 23:57:23 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to
     what's obviously bonkers about this is that if a judge can't be trusted to rule on this, how can you expect them to rule in corporate law cases or even criminal cases when evidence relies on technically complex methods
   • Embed this notice
     Ripsnort (ripsnort@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jul-2024 03:50:45 JST Ripsnort

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro It's weird how pro-tradition shitlibs become when it comes to defending retarded mistakes like Roe v. Wade or the Chevron decision.
     >This law was created a half century ago! Don't you have any respect for your predecessors?
     
     Meanwhile all laws enacted during that same period that protect the working class or traditional Christian values should be ignored because literally everyone back then was a literal member of the literal KKK or whatever.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jul-2024 03:50:45 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • Ripsnort
     @Ripsnort it would be funny if it weren't so routine. They're just friend/enemy distinction to the bone