Per Rawstory;
"Judge Cannon's latest handiwork -- the hearing on 'particularity' — is particularly ill-founded legally," said former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann.
"And on crime-fraud, it is not clear to me why this issue is not precluded ('issue preclusion,' just like what happened in the second E Jean Carroll trial) by the fully litigated issue having been decided by the D.C. court after Trump was heard."
Cannon's 11-page order set a hearing to determine whether specific evidence from former Trump attorney Evan Corcoran should be excluded due to attorney-client privilege, despite the crime fraud exception which states the privilege doesn't apply if the conversations relate to ongoing or future crimes.
In D.C, Judge Beryl Howell has already ruled that Corcoran needed to testify because of the exception.