GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    xenya :determination: :flag_lesbian_lebanon: :xf_freebsd: (xenia@pleromer.net)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2024 13:15:38 JST xenya :determination: :flag_lesbian_lebanon: :xf_freebsd: xenya :determination: :flag_lesbian_lebanon: :xf_freebsd:
    fedi needs a way to control who can reply to posts ngl
    sometimes i may want a post to be publicly viewable but only want followers or no one at all to reply to them (mainly in shitposts where i don't care about people's opinions)
    In conversation about a year ago from pleromer.net permalink
    • Pleroma-tan likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Pleroma-tan (kirby@lab.nyanide.com)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2024 13:15:37 JST Pleroma-tan Pleroma-tan
      in reply to
      @xenia This would most likely be impossible to enforce in a federated network
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Pleroma-tan (kirby@lab.nyanide.com)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2024 13:17:40 JST Pleroma-tan Pleroma-tan
      in reply to
      • Pleroma-tan
      @xenia You can always simply reject all replies to a certain post, but I don't think that would stop other implementations from accepting it, due to the nature of public posts and activitypub

      i think it would require some amount of fucking with the spec to get right
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Pleroma-tan (kirby@lab.nyanide.com)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2024 13:22:22 JST Pleroma-tan Pleroma-tan
      in reply to
      • Pleroma-tan
      @xenia you could probably simply add an extra entry specifying that a post is one of those modes, and then have all major implementations reject replies if the op is unreplyable [this by itself is a rather faulty way of doing it i would imagine]

      though doesn't stop other implementations from ignoring that, but it'll make you feel better ™️
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      m0xEE (m0xee@social.librem.one)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2024 13:55:37 JST m0xEE m0xEE
      in reply to
      • Pleroma-tan

      @kirby @xenia
      Yep, and that would be it, if original poster doesn't see comments, it means they don't exist. You can't prevent people from discussing things, you can only hinder it in some way. Someone can always post the link to the post and others can comment under that — as it often happens with posts on other social media 🤷

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Pleroma-tan likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Pleroma-tan (kirby@lab.nyanide.com)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2024 13:58:20 JST Pleroma-tan Pleroma-tan
      in reply to
      • m0xEE
      @m0xee @xenia quite dumb if the idea is to prevent discussion altogether
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      m0xEE (m0xee@social.librem.one)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2024 14:03:45 JST m0xEE m0xEE
      in reply to
      • Pleroma-tan

      @kirby @xenia
      Yeah, like I said, you can't prevent people from discussing things. Even totalitarian regimes ultimately fail at that 😏

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Pleroma-tan likes this.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.