Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Raccoon🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈 (raccoon@techhub.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Jun-2024 17:45:16 JST Raccoon🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈

   • Barmaid
   • David Benfell, Ph.D. (he/him/his)

   @benfell @Barmaid
   Normally I'd agree, because one should always be somewhat skeptical of things posted on the tag, but I feel like the fact that they put it loudly in the URL is enough for us to block them over here, and I trust that diligence was done before posting on the tag in this case.

   If someone comes forward with evidence that they are something like a mental illness support group, we can revisit that, but I honestly don't want to check for myself either.

   • Embed this notice
     13 barn owls in a trenchcoat (hauntedowlbear@eldritch.cafe)'s status on Sunday, 02-Jun-2024 17:45:16 JST 13 barn owls in a trenchcoat

     in reply to

     • Barmaid
     • David Benfell, Ph.D. (he/him/his)

     @Raccoon @benfell @Barmaid

     I did look into it while doing due diligence before blocking from the instance I run, and the few posts their admin has that are publicly available include boosts of overt activism for sexual contact with children.

     So I'm just going to go ahead and put the whole fucking instance in the bin, thank you.