GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: (brooke@bikeshed.vibber.net)'s status on Thursday, 09-May-2024 04:50:10 JST Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee:
    • Evan Prodromou

    @evan either "very" or "somewhat" depending on what you mean by "equality"

    In conversation about a year ago from bikeshed.vibber.net permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Thursday, 09-May-2024 04:50:09 JST Evan Prodromou Evan Prodromou
      in reply to

      @brooke what do you think it means?

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Thursday, 09-May-2024 05:24:34 JST Evan Prodromou Evan Prodromou
      in reply to

      @brooke You are doing a terrible job of dissuading me from posting vague, poorly-defined questions. Thank you so much for this! 🙏🏼

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: (brooke@bikeshed.vibber.net)'s status on Thursday, 09-May-2024 05:24:35 JST Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee:
      in reply to
      • Evan Prodromou

      @evan others might say that "equality" is about equality of access to resources: that everyone has equal rights to live and thrive and allowing them to starve on the streets is not part of "equality"

      others say that "equality" is "everyone has the equal opportunity to hopefully beg for a job so they can buy food and pay rent"

      the first might be 'somewhat important', though i prefer 'equity' as a term maybe?

      the latter, again, is evil so "important" or "not important" is not a useful answer

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: (brooke@bikeshed.vibber.net)'s status on Thursday, 09-May-2024 05:24:36 JST Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee:
      in reply to
      • Evan Prodromou

      @evan some folks think "equality" means you should ignore peoples' circumstances and judge them based on very narrow criteria, ignoring wider truths around them. others believe that "equality" requires paying attention to those larger truths.

      which one is "equality"? if the former, then i'm not sure how to answer on this scale, it's not that it's "important" or "not important", but rather that it's "evil".

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: (brooke@bikeshed.vibber.net)'s status on Thursday, 09-May-2024 05:24:36 JST Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee:
      in reply to
      • Evan Prodromou

      @evan if the latter, then i'd say it's very important.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: (brooke@bikeshed.vibber.net)'s status on Thursday, 09-May-2024 05:24:37 JST Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee:
      in reply to
      • Evan Prodromou

      @evan i know you prefer not to clarify what your questions mean and just like the debate and numbers, but i find it difficult to answer in a clear way when the questions are unclear. so i just pick one working response semi-randomly figuring that's good enough, and put my notes in the reply. :)

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: (brooke@bikeshed.vibber.net)'s status on Thursday, 09-May-2024 05:24:37 JST Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee:
      in reply to
      • Evan Prodromou

      @evan you might mean "equality" in terms of equal access to needs and resources, something that doesn't exist but some folks strive for at least in part. or "equality before the law", the idea that everyone should be judged fairly in legal proceedings. but people interpret that sort of thing differently, too, with disagreement about whether non-equal circumstances are included in judging

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: (brooke@bikeshed.vibber.net)'s status on Thursday, 09-May-2024 05:24:38 JST Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee:
      in reply to
      • Evan Prodromou

      @evan i prefer to avoid the term because it's unclear

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: (brooke@bikeshed.vibber.net)'s status on Thursday, 09-May-2024 21:03:58 JST Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee:
      in reply to
      • Evan Prodromou

      @evan it occurs to me this may be an autism spectrum thing. i find it very distressing to be asked to answer an unclear question and seek clarification, but you explicitly choose not to clarify the questions, which i find bewildering and try to compensate for by listing a bunch of possibilities you will neither confirm nor deny. :)

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Thursday, 09-May-2024 21:03:58 JST Evan Prodromou Evan Prodromou
      in reply to

      @brooke I get that and I realize it's tough for people.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.