Conversation

Notices

Embed this notice
Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 08-May-2024 00:12:33 JST Bread up, Bro

I need to check the numbers, but wild if true
In conversation about a year ago from poa.st permalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment
  https://i.poastcdn.org/2ec78f215b21a6ba7c56377a7d676a703b633515d7d930315cee9d9f7a0d12b8.png
- Embed this notice
  Caek Islove ? ❤️ (caekislove@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 08-May-2024 00:22:31 JST Caek Islove ? ❤️
  in reply to
  
  @sickburnbro I don't know why that guy feels unconcerned. The less capable the GAE is at conventional warfare the more likely they'll go nuclear if things get hot against Russia, China or Iran and it looks like they'll lose.
  
  In conversation about a year ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 08-May-2024 00:22:31 JST Bread up, Bro
  in reply to
  - Caek Islove ? ❤️
  @caekislove your assumption that they are capable at nuclear warfare is optimistic.
  
  What I'm worried about is what happens when everyone knows that they aren't.
  
  In conversation about a year ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 08-May-2024 00:24:57 JST Bread up, Bro
  in reply to
  - Krieger_88
  @Krieger_88 so what he is saying is that they have or are going to scrap their pre-positioning ships. He is not uninformed. He is simply saying "I think the direction the military is taking is stupid" - they know they are doing this, and are saying "well, this isn't how combat is going to be fought"
  
  In conversation about a year ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  Krieger_88 (krieger_88@nationalist.social)'s status on Wednesday, 08-May-2024 00:25:03 JST Krieger_88
  in reply to
  
  That looks like the uninformed and presumptuous speculations of a retard who wants updoots.
  
  But, hey, if both the USMC AND the USMC are saying those things, who knows?
  
  In conversation about a year ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 08-May-2024 00:25:22 JST Bread up, Bro
  in reply to
  - Krieger_88
  @Krieger_88 but as we know, combat is rarely fought the way the defender wants it to be fought.
  
  In conversation about a year ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 08-May-2024 00:29:00 JST Bread up, Bro
  in reply to
  - Caek Islove ? ❤️
  @caekislove en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fogbank
  In conversation about a year ago permalink
  Attachments
  1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
    
    Fogbank
    
    Fogbank (stylized as FOGBANK) is a code name given to a secret material used in the W76, W78 and W88 nuclear warheads that are part of the United States nuclear arsenal. The process to create Fogbank was lost by 2000, when it was needed for the refurbishment of old warheads. Fogbank was then reverse engineered by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) over five years and at the cost of tens of millions of dollars. Fogbank's precise nature is classified; in the words of former Oak Ridge general manager Dennis Ruddy, "The material is classified. Its composition is classified. Its use in the weapon is classified, and the process itself is classified." Department of Energy Nuclear Explosive Safety documents simply describe it as a material "used in nuclear weapons and nuclear explosives" along with lithium hydride (LiH) and lithium deuteride (LiD), beryllium (Be), uranium hydride (UH3), and plutonium hydride. However, NNSA Administrator Tom D'Agostino disclosed the role of Fogbank in the weapon: "There's another material in the—it's called interstage material, also known as Fogbank", and arms experts believe that Fogbank is an aerogel...
- Embed this notice
  Caek Islove ? ❤️ (caekislove@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 08-May-2024 00:29:01 JST Caek Islove ? ❤️
  in reply to
  
  @sickburnbro Not maintaining a functioning nuclear arsenal would be suicide, but looking at their policies in multiple other areas it certainly couldn't be ruled out.
  
  In conversation about a year ago permalink

Public

Conversation

Notices

Feeds