Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   matthew - retroedge.tech (matthew@social.retroedge.tech)'s status on Monday, 06-May-2024 05:49:06 JST matthew - retroedge.tech

   • T man :sex: :puffgiga: :puffpowerroll:
   • ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware:
   Yeah, I can see that from a social perspective.
   
   Thanks for sharing your experience and perspective.
   
   I am quite excited about checking #nostr out right now. So we'll see if my enthusiasm is curbed or if it grows with time.
   • Embed this notice
     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: (dcc@annihilation.social)'s status on Monday, 06-May-2024 05:49:06 JST ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware:

     in reply to

     • T man :sex: :puffgiga: :puffpowerroll:
     @matthew @theorytoe >possibilities
     There is none, if you think about how the protocol "works" it makes no sense. Its neithet federated nor peer to peer anf there is no social incentive to host a "relay". Even more so its easily censorable since every "relay" is its own server you need to connect to.
   • Embed this notice
     matthew - retroedge.tech (matthew@social.retroedge.tech)'s status on Monday, 06-May-2024 05:57:44 JST matthew - retroedge.tech

     in reply to

     • T man :sex: :puffgiga: :puffpowerroll:
     • ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware:
     I guess that's what I'm checking out now.
     
     I see the situation with nostr as much more positive and the model and protocol to be quite functional... but I am extremely new to the concept.
     
     The documentation looks good to me and I like what I've seen that has been built on it, so far.
     
     I appreciate your perspective @dcc though, as it may be useful to temper my enthusiasm right now.
     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.