GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Kyle Davis (linux_mclinuxface@fosstodon.org)'s status on Sunday, 05-May-2024 16:31:50 JST Kyle Davis Kyle Davis

    First, I love this project and want to build it.

    However, I'm going to go 'Old Man Yells at Cloud' on calling it open source and how the maker projects and #3Dprinting may be unintentionally damaging the general understanding of #OpenSource.

    a) the model is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. That is unambiguously not open source: NC means it restricts fields of endeavour.

    b) It 'remixes' code without a license from pastebin.

    (1/3 - edited to show YouTube preview)

    https://youtu.be/2xAk-wegS9o

    In conversation about a year ago from fosstodon.org permalink

    Attachments

    1. Making a cheap, open source 3D space mouse with Arduino and 3D printing
      from Teaching Tech
      Please take my 3D printing survey: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScLdZ1f56dygzCpS1spAEFAlMpM195eg-mkkUoCHunfhutQrA/viewformPlease take my 3D print...
    • Embed this notice
      Kyle Davis (linux_mclinuxface@fosstodon.org)'s status on Sunday, 05-May-2024 16:31:50 JST Kyle Davis Kyle Davis
      in reply to

      It also normalizes stretching the meaning of open source. So, when I try to explain that various source available licenses are not open source, I'm fighting against people with major audiences saying otherwise.

      (3/3)

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Sunday, 05-May-2024 16:31:50 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      @linux_mclinuxface This is to be expected, considering that most "open source" supporters have never seen the; https://opensource.org/osd

      Additionally, the OSI has not approved any creative commons license, as those licenses are not suitable for software.

      Most people look at "open source" and it assume it means that the source code is publicly available (there is no good way to explain why it's more than that, as describing the 10 requirements takes far too long).

      Of course, people have gone and stretched the term so far it snaps and use it to refer to "participatory" situations, which are in fact extremely proprietary and will continue to do so, as people almost never call them out.

      https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html


      People may assume free software means software you can get gratis, but once you tell them that free means freedom and request they think before believing what advertisers tell them, they won't make the same mistake again: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#four-freedoms
      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
        The Open Source Definition | Open Source Initiative
      2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.gnu.org
        Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Software - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
        from mailto:webmasters@gnu.org
      3. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.gnu.org
        What is Free Software? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
        from mailto:webmasters@gnu.org
        Since 1983, developing the free Unix style operating system GNU, so that computer users can have the freedom to share and improve the software they use.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.