Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Xeon² (izaya@social.shadowkat.net)'s status on Wednesday, 01-May-2024 22:17:55 JST Xeon²

   • Justin de Haas :celeste_hearts_catgender:
   @prinsje wait, the only 16:10 on this list is 2560x1600? I've never even heard of a display with that res, and the only 1920x1440 I've encountered is my e-reader
   on the other hand, 1680x1050 and 1440x900 were the standards for desktop displays c. 2011
   not to mention 1280x1024 before that, and having 640x480 but not 1024x768
   
   feels like this set of options was picked to confuse me specifically :blobcatgoogly:
   
   (and to answer the actual question, 1920x1200 here :menherawave:)
   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 01-May-2024 22:17:53 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • Justin de Haas :celeste_hearts_catgender:
     @prinsje I was going to vote then I realized 1920x1200 was missing.
     
     You didn't include 3+ voooters.
   • Embed this notice
     Justin de Haas :celeste_hearts_catgender: (prinsje@mirageisland.nl)'s status on Wednesday, 01-May-2024 22:17:55 JST Justin de Haas :celeste_hearts_catgender:

     in reply to
     @izaya good lord can yall stop complaining about the options, its being so fucking annoying when i hear for the 5495854th time that "i did not include someone" and it turns out they use like, 4K or some shit