Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Pleroma-tan (kirby@lab.nyanide.com)'s status on Wednesday, 01-May-2024 19:11:02 JST Pleroma-tan
   Ee2e for ap concerns me a bit, fuck is it going to be optional to implement?
   • Embed this notice
     Pleroma-tan (kirby@lab.nyanide.com)'s status on Wednesday, 01-May-2024 19:22:16 JST Pleroma-tan

     in reply to

     • The real Ryan Gosling :ancap-chan_ok:
     @RyanGosling the rfc terminology usually states if you want to be compliant with a spec there are certain terminologies you are forced to follow but you could probably duck some of them
   • Embed this notice
     The real Ryan Gosling :ancap-chan_ok: (ryangosling@bae.st)'s status on Wednesday, 01-May-2024 19:22:17 JST The real Ryan Gosling :ancap-chan_ok:

     in reply to
     @kirby everythings optional. the implementations decide shit not the standards
   • Embed this notice
     The real Ryan Gosling :ancap-chan_ok: (ryangosling@bae.st)'s status on Wednesday, 01-May-2024 19:22:58 JST The real Ryan Gosling :ancap-chan_ok:

     in reply to
     @kirby nobody cares if theyre technically compliant though. the rfcs alone are not getting you masto/pleroma/misskry/etc compatible
     Pleroma-tan likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Pleroma-tan (kirby@lab.nyanide.com)'s status on Wednesday, 01-May-2024 19:42:28 JST Pleroma-tan

     in reply to

     • The real Ryan Gosling :ancap-chan_ok:
     @RyanGosling that's true