Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   javi@goblin.band's status on Monday, 29-Apr-2024 04:22:58 JST javi

   Look, USians, I don't want to step into your internal politics, but you see, 45 years ago, we spaniards had the occurrence to write in our constitution that the head of state (the king) has immunity from prosecution for anything they do while they are in the job, and now we have an ex-king with a Wikipedia page that includes a "alleged corruption" section 55 paragraphs long.
   
   And it's only "alleged" because he can't be taken to court even with the piles of evidence that exist.
   
   Just saying.

   • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:, Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem:, clacke and gidi like this.
   • Embed this notice
     elmussol (elmussol@streams.elsmussols.net)'s status on Monday, 29-Apr-2024 21:29:00 JST elmussol

     in reply to

     • Waitman Gobble
     That's the scumbag. DR  was one of the rumours, it actually turned out to be the United Arab Emirates. I could rant for hours on this lowlife, starting with being a billionnaire who has paid no maintenance for his three illegitimate children. What is it with billionaires' penises?
     clacke likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Waitman Gobble (hello@rumbly.net)'s status on Monday, 29-Apr-2024 21:29:06 JST Waitman Gobble

     in reply to
     Is that the guy who 'fled" to Dominican Republic? I remember seeing something in the news.
   • Embed this notice
     masukomi (masukomi@dice.camp)'s status on Tuesday, 30-Apr-2024 15:03:17 JST masukomi

     in reply to

     • improper ideologue

     @thedansimonson @javi the thing I don't get is that IF the Supreme Court said "that the president couldn't be prosecuted for things including assassination" then why do they believe that they wouldn't themselves be assassinated the moment someone took power that didn't like their beliefs / agenda?

     clacke likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     improper ideologue (thedansimonson@lingo.lol)'s status on Tuesday, 30-Apr-2024 15:03:18 JST improper ideologue

     in reply to

     @javi I think we’re mostly right there with you—but the Supreme Court can and does just make up stuff, and we have zero control over these fucking clowns.