GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    pinkdrunkenelephants (pinkdrunkenelephants@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 14:08:16 JST pinkdrunkenelephants pinkdrunkenelephants

    So I want to leave .social for a better server that doesn't federate with Threads, but the ones on the fedipact website either actually do federate with Threads anyway (looking at you mas.to) or they're invite-only. :(

    #mastodon #fedipact

    In conversation Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 14:08:16 JST from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. mas.to
      Hello! mas.to is a general-topic instance. We're enthusiastic about Mastodon and aim to run a fast, up-to-date and fun Mastodon instance.
    • Embed this notice
      pinkdrunkenelephants (pinkdrunkenelephants@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 14:30:09 JST pinkdrunkenelephants pinkdrunkenelephants
      • trumpet@mas.to
      • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

      @tokyo_0 @trumpet I signed up for an account there and the other users warned me that's what was going on. I deleted my mas.to account promptly afterwards. 🤷

      In conversation Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 14:30:09 JST permalink

      Attachments

      1. mas.to
        Hello! mas.to is a general-topic instance. We're enthusiastic about Mastodon and aim to run a fast, up-to-date and fun Mastodon instance.
    • Embed this notice
      pinkdrunkenelephants (pinkdrunkenelephants@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 14:34:08 JST pinkdrunkenelephants pinkdrunkenelephants
      • trumpet@mas.to
      • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

      @tokyo_0 @trumpet 🤷 Even if I was, it probably wouldn't be a good idea to use an instance where people were doing that anyway. I found another instance that banned Threads though, and if approved I likely will move my account there in the next few days.

      In conversation Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 14:34:08 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Mad Argon :qurio: (madargon@is-a.cat)'s status on Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 18:38:37 JST Mad Argon :qurio: Mad Argon :qurio:
      • trumpet@mas.to
      • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

      @tokyo_0 @pinkdrunkenelephants @trumpet I saw posts related to this. Initially mas.to blocked Threads but later changed this to limited. And lists could be not updated after this :/

      In conversation Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 18:38:37 JST permalink

      Attachments

      1. mas.to
        Hello! mas.to is a general-topic instance. We're enthusiastic about Mastodon and aim to run a fast, up-to-date and fun Mastodon instance.
      Tokyo Outsider (337ppm) repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      trumpet@mas.to (trumpet@mas.to)'s status on Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 18:50:19 JST trumpet@mas.to trumpet@mas.to
      in reply to
      • Mad Argon :qurio:
      • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

      @madargon @tokyo_0 @pinkdrunkenelephants Hello there! mas.to still currently blocks Threads. We’ve posted about how we could theoretically move to limiting with Authorized Fetch enabled and per-user blocks in place, but we haven’t changed anything so far.

      In conversation Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 18:50:19 JST permalink

      Attachments

      1. mas.to
        Hello! mas.to is a general-topic instance. We're enthusiastic about Mastodon and aim to run a fast, up-to-date and fun Mastodon instance.
    • Embed this notice
      trumpet@mas.to (trumpet@mas.to)'s status on Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 19:13:32 JST trumpet@mas.to trumpet@mas.to
      • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

      @tokyo_0 Thread here: https://mas.to/@trumpet/112212159528724033

      In conversation Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 19:13:32 JST permalink

      Attachments

      1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
        trumpet@mas.to (@trumpet@mas.to)
        from trumpet@mas.to
        A THREAD ON THREADS! I’m receiving lots of questions about our position on federation with Threads and realised I haven’t posted on this subject for a while. We have lots of users who do want to federate with Threads, and lots of users who don’t. It’s my job to find a good solution that works for everyone. Our position has always been to start from a defensive stance due to our technical and moderation concerns. So what sort of solution do we think might keep (almost) everyone happy? 1/3
    • Embed this notice
      trumpet@mas.to (trumpet@mas.to)'s status on Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 19:27:40 JST trumpet@mas.to trumpet@mas.to
      • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

      @tokyo_0 What I posted is a proposal that I think might be the best compromise to protect those who don't want to interact with Threads, while allowing those who do the ability to connect. Still looking into the technical aspects of it.

      In conversation Thursday, 25-Apr-2024 19:27:40 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      trumpet@mas.to (trumpet@mas.to)'s status on Saturday, 27-Apr-2024 17:34:57 JST trumpet@mas.to trumpet@mas.to
      • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

      @tokyo_0 Definitely thought of that approach too, the only thing is I thought it might be a little messy. But an option!

      In conversation Saturday, 27-Apr-2024 17:34:57 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.