Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Florian Haas (xahteiwi@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 18-Apr-2024 15:58:10 JST Florian Haas

   Opinion: people who staunchly prefer working with Gerrit, and consider anything else inferior, *really* love working with git-review. And if git-review were not Gerrit specific they would be just as happy with, say, GitLab.

   The process that the git-review/Gerrit combo automates/enforces (one commit per change, automatically generated topic branches, change IDs with cross-project uniqueness) could also work just fine by hooking up git-review with the GitLab API.

   Discuss.

   #Gerrit #Git #GitLab

   • Embed this notice
     Peter Krefting (nafmo@social.vivaldi.net)'s status on Thursday, 18-Apr-2024 15:58:10 JST Peter Krefting

     in reply to

     @xahteiwi Maybe it is time I properly learned "git review" then, since we are using #Gerrit at $DAYJOB. So far, I have only been using "git review -d" to download changes to test them for review, and nothing else...

     I sort of like the Gerrit workflow, it has grown on me. I would like a better way to group changes like Critic did, though. Good thing that there are many ways to do things, so that groups can find a workflow that works for them.