GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Semilexic (epictittus@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:11:21 JST Semilexic Semilexic
    • Bread up, Bro
    Laser IRS are so accurate nowadays that it gps isnt needed for such a short trip, as long as you dont care about hitting within 1m.

    RT: https://poa.st/objects/83e539db-d530-4f21-b476-b0f415b06fdf
    In conversation about a year ago from poa.st permalink

    Attachments


    • Embed this notice
      Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:11:20 JST Bread up, Bro Bread up, Bro
      in reply to
      @epictittus laser is subject to atmospheric concerns
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:20:52 JST Bread up, Bro Bread up, Bro
      in reply to
      • gentoobro
      @gentoobro @epictittus the problem figuring out where you, the missile is. If you have something like GPS, you don't need to worry so much about drift of measurements since you can refresh.

      As an simple example: if it were easy to guide missiles, SpaceX wouldn't have lost a ton of rockets.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      gentoobro (gentoobro@gleasonator.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:20:53 JST gentoobro gentoobro
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro

      @epictittus @sickburnbro Just use a camera and cached satellite photos. This is roughly how a tomahawk guides itself. There are few practical jamming methods.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      CoQ_10 (coq_10@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:23:19 JST CoQ_10 CoQ_10
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro
      @sickburnbro @epictittus Who manufactures ring laser gyroscopes? Anybody know?
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:23:19 JST Bread up, Bro Bread up, Bro
      in reply to
      • CoQ_10
      @CoQ_10 @epictittus we'll see who has functioning whatever soon
      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://i.poastcdn.org/1c0e0059a168dd8a280b34756b5fa6805481236bbf514252454d068112079130.png
    • Embed this notice
      gentoobro (gentoobro@gleasonator.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:31:35 JST gentoobro gentoobro
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro

      @sickburnbro @epictittus For low-ish flying guided missiles, the missile has an onboard downward pointing camera which it compares to cached aerial photos. It's very effective. I believe the tomahawk used a radar version, but the principle is the same.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Bread up, Bro likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:33:21 JST Bread up, Bro Bread up, Bro
      in reply to
      • gentoobro
      @gentoobro @epictittus right, there are many options that don't need gps, many of them are pretty neat.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:35:14 JST Bread up, Bro Bread up, Bro
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro
      • gentoobro
      @gentoobro @epictittus but all of them have tradeoffs. ( And we're seeing the tradeoff GPS has - don't use geolocation schemes controlled by people who don't like you )
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      gentoobro (gentoobro@gleasonator.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:37:29 JST gentoobro gentoobro
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro

      @sickburnbro @epictittus High-flying ballistic missiles are another story, but you really shouldn't be using those as weapons anymore anyway. They're much easier to detect, track, and defend against than something skimming the surface.

      Guiding hypersonic glide vehicles is probably a huge pain in the ass. GPS is likely too slow and onboard cameras would be a big blur. My guess is they're some combination of high precision inertial guidance and target illumination where possible. Online sources are rather vague about the details.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Bread up, Bro likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      gentoobro (gentoobro@gleasonator.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:39:35 JST gentoobro gentoobro
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro

      @sickburnbro @epictittus Not only that, but it's relatively easy to jam. All of the current satnav ones are. The US is extremely dependent on GPS and it will come to bite them should they go to war with a country from the 21st century.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:39:35 JST Bread up, Bro Bread up, Bro
      in reply to
      • gentoobro
      @gentoobro @epictittus my assumption would be that if Russia really wants a fight, they'll just destroy the constellation.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 08:40:20 JST Bread up, Bro Bread up, Bro
      in reply to
      • gentoobro
      @gentoobro @epictittus the question is has russia given iran any technology as way to play the same proxy war game the US has been playing for the last few decades
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      AsukaNeko (asukaneko@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 09:00:13 JST AsukaNeko AsukaNeko
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro
      • gentoobro
      @sickburnbro @gentoobro @epictittus Maybe S-400 systems, and I believe Iran is on a par with Russia as far as drone tech.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Bread up, Bro likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Semilexic (epictittus@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 09:03:35 JST Semilexic Semilexic
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro
      @sickburnbro >laser is subject to atmospheric concerns
      um.... wut? its enclosed

      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_laser_gyroscope
      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: upload.wikimedia.org
        Ring laser gyroscope
        A ring laser gyroscope (RLG) consists of a ring laser having two independent counter-propagating resonant modes over the same path; the difference in phase is used to detect rotation. It operates on the principle of the Sagnac effect which shifts the nulls of the internal standing wave pattern in response to angular rotation. Interference between the counter-propagating beams, observed externally, results in motion of the standing wave pattern, and thus indicates rotation. Description The first experimental ring laser gyroscope was demonstrated in the US by Macek and Davis in 1963. Various organizations worldwide subsequently developed ring-laser technology further. Many tens of thousands of RLGs are operating in inertial navigation systems and have established high accuracy, with better than 0.01°/hour bias uncertainty, and mean time between failures in excess of 60,000 hours. Ring laser gyroscopes can be used as the stable elements (for one degree of freedom each) in an inertial reference system. The advantage of using an RLG is that there are no moving parts (apart from the dither motor assembly (see further...
    • Embed this notice
      Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 09:03:35 JST Bread up, Bro Bread up, Bro
      in reply to
      @epictittus yes, a gyroscope helps provide orientation, which is one important input for guidance
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      AsukaNeko (asukaneko@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 09:08:05 JST AsukaNeko AsukaNeko
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro
      • gentoobro
      @gentoobro @epictittus @sickburnbro The other part is do they have the economy to wage war. Decades of sanctions may have made them more self sufficient than the west realizes.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Bread up, Bro likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      gentoobro (gentoobro@gleasonator.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 09:08:06 JST gentoobro gentoobro
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro
      • AsukaNeko

      @AsukaNeko @epictittus @sickburnbro We have really yet to see what sort of air defense Iran really has. They seem to keep much of their tech under wraps until the last minute.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      WilhelmIII (wilhelmiii@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 09:11:31 JST WilhelmIII WilhelmIII
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro
      Laser INS still suffer from precession, just not as much as the old ones.

      And extraneous g-forces can induce errors, so no yanking and banking on the way in.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Bread up, Bro likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 09:12:08 JST Bread up, Bro Bread up, Bro
      in reply to
      • WilhelmIII
      @WilhelmIII @epictittus that's I think what the "short trip" covers
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 22:44:53 JST Bread up, Bro Bread up, Bro
      in reply to
      • Vulpes_Quartus
      • gentoobro
      @Vulpes_Quartus @epictittus @gentoobro the problem is that contractors don't invest because they have responded to incentives, and those are that the government will drop a contractor in a heartbeat.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Semilexic (epictittus@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 22:44:54 JST Semilexic Semilexic
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro
      • gentoobro
      @gentoobro @sickburnbro I saw a vid of a drone factory in russia, they are ramping up to mass production, Ill try to find it

      Edit: Found vid

      Its not difficult to make, they just never did it...
      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments


    • Embed this notice
      Vulpes_Quartus (vulpes_quartus@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 22:44:54 JST Vulpes_Quartus Vulpes_Quartus
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro
      • gentoobro
      We're hamstrung by lack imagination at the deciding level and by contractors
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Semilexic (epictittus@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 22:44:55 JST Semilexic Semilexic
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro
      • gentoobro
      @gentoobro @sickburnbro Iran is more secretive, but theyre not at war right now. Comparatively, theyre both genuinely better off than a lot of western countries conventionally, maybe all.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      gentoobro (gentoobro@gleasonator.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 22:44:55 JST gentoobro gentoobro
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro

      @epictittus @sickburnbro Iran is the only country that appears to be taking drones seriously. China has a few toys in development. Russia has Lancets, but they're still on the pricey side and not producing nearly enough of them. The US has quadrillion dollar pilotless F35's that might be combat ready in 10 years, assuming Boeing doesn't decide to milk more cash out of the project.

      Iran, on the other hand, is the biggest military drone supplier with a large variety of models at very low prices. They also have built a dedicated drone carrier and have two more in drydock. A converted cargo ship isn't the best platform (submarines?) but it's not much worse than the US aircraft carriers.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Semilexic (epictittus@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 22:44:56 JST Semilexic Semilexic
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro
      • gentoobro
      @gentoobro @sickburnbro Iran is ahead in production, not tech. Russia probably has better tech but its sitting in a drawer or on a piece of paper in a binder. Iran has produced a shitload of materiel and snuck it away into underground warehouses, thats why Russia turned to them for drones.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      gentoobro (gentoobro@gleasonator.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 22:44:56 JST gentoobro gentoobro
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro

      @epictittus @sickburnbro I suspect that Iran is not tipping their cards whereas Russia is talking bigger than they are, in net, all in all.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      gentoobro (gentoobro@gleasonator.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 22:44:57 JST gentoobro gentoobro
      in reply to
      • Bread up, Bro

      @sickburnbro @epictittus By my estimation, it's the other way around. Iran is likely technologically ahead of Russia in net right now. Clearly they lag in space launch and nuclear, but those aren't particularly important in modern warfare so long as you can cause problems for satnav weapons. Which they have already demonstrated.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.