Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   iced depresso (icedquinn@blob.cat)'s status on Thursday, 04-Apr-2024 06:55:25 JST iced depresso
   > if you don't like wayland then you're an antivaxxer flat earther
   
   OH BLOB :ablobcatpopcorn:
   • Embed this notice
     iced depresso (icedquinn@blob.cat)'s status on Thursday, 04-Apr-2024 07:35:56 JST iced depresso

     in reply to

     • Pope Bob
     @bobdobberson i check wayland about once a year and speedrun in to a usability problem with it, then go back to X. i guess some people are a lot more passionate about it.
   • Embed this notice
     Pope Bob (bobdobberson@dobbs.town)'s status on Thursday, 04-Apr-2024 07:35:58 JST Pope Bob

     in reply to

     @icedquinn

     > > if you don't like wayland then you're an antivaxxer flat earther

     Yet weirdly, Pro-Biden, at the same time. Those goofy Wayland folks.

   • Embed this notice
     iced depresso (icedquinn@blob.cat)'s status on Thursday, 04-Apr-2024 07:54:37 JST iced depresso

     in reply to

     • Pope Bob
     @bobdobberson process separation isn't much of a thing in x11. you can sandbox the process, but if it touches the x server you can basically get at any other process through it.
     
     wayland is supposed to prevent that.
   • Embed this notice
     Pope Bob (bobdobberson@dobbs.town)'s status on Thursday, 04-Apr-2024 07:54:38 JST Pope Bob

     in reply to

     @icedquinn I feel that. My only interest really is the alleged security of it, versus the X model, but I'm not entirely sure how the X model exposes my security.