Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
>Mohammed was speaking the truth, therefore he didn't need eyewitnesses for his revelation to prove he was speaking the truth
Ah, islamic theology. I'm muting the thread. It was 3 weeks old when you reacted again. I asked you to prove how he wasn't lying but all you did was send a Youtube vid of almost 2 hours. Ain't watching that shit I need to look at brownoids enough in real life already.
-
Embed this notice
>The section I highlighted is 1hr30mins long at most if you speed up the video.
-
Embed this notice
You are a disingenuous coward.
The video proves how he isn’t lying. I won’t paraphrase an entire argument when they’ve produced an excellent presentation already.
The section I highlighted is 1hr30mins long at most if you speed up the video. You would have spent at least this much time going back and forth with me regardless.
Would you still be this stubborn if I provided you with a guidance on how to live your life and be happy? Because I think everyone sound of mind would gladly take up that offer.
If you were accused of a crime in court, I as a judge would only need an eyewitness if it could not be proven that you are telling the truth. There are no other options than the 4 listed.
-
Embed this notice
It's just a big ask, and it shouldn't take that long to explain why someone wasn't making things up.
-
Embed this notice
It’s only a pain to listen to a lecture if you don’t care about the truth hence why he is a coward.
He didn’t even think what the purpose of an eyewitness testimony is. If someone is telling the truth then you wouldn’t need one. It cancels it out.